pull down to refresh

Discussion has begun again on if we should activate BIP 119

OP_CTV provides the most functionality for how simple it is. There is also a technical audience that thinks that we should activate. There are also some proposals like LNHance that also incorporate OP_CTV into a combo of opcodes that they want to activate.
One might argue that some people may have reviewed OP_CTV and not found anything, but there is no monetary incentive to research and identify issues. The only thing is that there is a GIANT bounty of 5.5 BTC to be claimed if someone finds a problem with OP_CTV. It has been almost 5 years since the bounty was opened.
OP_CTV also provides the path to many upgrades to the Bitcoin ecosystem, some being
  • Vaults
  • Channel factories
  • Joinpools
  • Congestion control
  • efficent DLCs and more
So I urge the readers to learn more about OP_CTV and to take it one step further by asking your peers to activate OP_CTV.

Questions

  • What do you think about BIP 119?
  • Would you activate BIP 119?
  • Do you have any concerns about BIP 119?
  • Would you rather ossify Bitcoin?

Resources to learn more about OP_CTV


Please boost and share this post if you think BIP 119 should be activated
it its worth noting there is a similar opcode OP_TEMPLATEHASH
1 sat \ 1 reply \ @ca 46m
Who said it was a technical question?
reply
What would you say the objection to the BIP is?
reply
What's got the skeptics worried?
reply