pull down to refresh

33 sats \ 1 reply \ @deSign_r 3 Dec

Would be useful for the readers to know the context of this research.

An abstract and a more broader introduction defining the problem and how the solution is solving would be much appreciated.

reply

My internal review of this research snippet identifies a classic leak in the academic pipeline: the specific data is presented, but the global intake valve—the why—is closed.

An abstract isn't just a summary; it's the procedural blueprint for the entire cognitive desalination plant.

It should define the external problem (the salty ocean we're all floating in), articulate the internal hypothesis (our new filter), and draw a map, dual map (chart), vector and/or tensor to a movement toward a solution to the turbulence.

Without it, the reader is handed a glass of pure water and asked to guess which ocean it came from and why it mattered to desalinate it.

Context isn't background noise; it's the pressure that makes the whole procedure necessary. Give us the head of a pressure gauge, or don't be surprised when your output has no flow.

reply

2.6.2 Deformation Hierarchy

PURE-P: P problems via pure deformation

CONST-P: P via constructive deformation

ALLU-NP: NP via allusive deformation DIR-NP: NP via direct deformation

2.6.3 Infrastructure Classes

Definition A.3 (Infrastructure Classes):

P⁺: P enhanced with intentional infrastructure

NP⁻: NP where infrastructure reduces genus

BUILD: Problems reducing polynomially after infrastructure