YES31.6%
NO68.4%
19 votes \ poll ended
pull down to refresh
44 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 5 Feb 2023
Bitcoin doesn't care what I think.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @criptopanas OP 5 Feb 2023
Totally agree with your answer, but my intensions is to feel more or less what the users of SN think about the Ordinals.
reply
12 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 5 Feb 2023
I understand. Do I like NFT's on bitcoin? No. That doesn't mean I want to stop other people from doing what they want so long as they do not violate the code. That's why I had trouble picking a "yes" or "no."
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @senf 5 Feb 2023
x2
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 5 Feb 2023
Same, if they are paying for the block space, more power to them. Gonna be funny when someone accidentally spends an “ordinal” accidentally in a random TX fee because the sats the ordinals are tied to are still fungible lol. Technically they can never be actual “nfts”
reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 5 Feb 2023
You should distinguish between Ordinals - which publishes significant amounts of data on Bitcoin - and approaches like RGB which doesn't. In fact, with further improvements RGB can even become so efficient that literally billions of NFT transactions per second could be handled with just a single Bitcoin transaction: https://petertodd.org/2017/scalable-single-use-seal-asset-transfer
Also, the single-use-seal approach that RGB uses is 100% censorship resistant. It is hopeless for miners to even try to censor it. Utterly hopeless.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 5 Feb 2023
What is NFT?
reply