pull down to refresh

Haha dang I didn’t know your wallet wasn’t attached next time I’ll ask for an invoice or your ln address
this territory is moderated
I’ve got the horse! Something must’ve gone wrong with the payment. cc/ @k00b
reply
reply
100 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 12 Dec
ah we probably don't have a route with enough liquidity to coinos. a lot of the folks using our coinos channel are bigger earners than spenders.
reply
How do you explain the 24,895 invoice instead of 25,000?
reply
22 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 12 Dec
Looks like a bug to me. I'll spend my day hunting for it.
reply
109 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 12 Dec
Actually, I forgot. We allow mixed payments now. You can use CCs and rewards sats to pay the sybil fee.
So the other 105 sats were paid with CCs & reward sats.
reply
reply
Good luck out there on the hunt! 🤠
reply
That darn liquidity! Always gets ya
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 13 Dec
okay I actually fixed this now ... this time I made sure I could zap you sats before reporting success
it was caused by a subtle bug in a library we use: https://github.com/alexbosworth/lightning/issues/207
reply
Strange
reply
reply
another weird thing is it's not 25K. Did the SN generate that invoice?
reply
SN takes a 30% Sybil fee for every zap
reply
Yeah. But the invoice generated by SN should’ve been 25k, not 24,895. That’s why later in my logs it shows 17,500 (25,000 × 0.7 = 17,500).
reply
Yep! Just dumped the logs here in case @k00b wants to look into it.
reply
Not sure what’s going on
reply
Scroll through the logs till you hit the 25k payment and share it!
reply
reply
Looks like there’s some bug in SN that’s messing up the invoices.
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 13 Dec
deleted by author
Didn’t mean to load you up with CCs
reply
No worries about that! I don’t mind having CCs, I end up using them sooner or later anyway.
reply