pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @padreug 10h \ parent \ on: 20 Years of Digital Life, Gone in an Instant, thanks to Apple tech
Why does this make you so charged? We're talking about cents on the dollar. Using cowboy credits is hardly impactful on the adoption of btc
We're talking about cents on the dollar.
Then why not send sats? Does using it require less effort when NGU?
Using cowboy credits is hardly impactful on the adoption of btc
Would you be here if nobody sent you sats, because it's "hardly impactful on the adoption of btc"?
reply
your own meme

reply
Now @DarthCoin is worried about tax code compliance?
So then how will we ever develop a circular bitcoin economy if we are all worried about tax compliance?
Answer- it will never happen if we do that.
The Mighty Anti-Statist Bitcoin Warrior @DarthCoin dare not spend any sats ever because the taxman might catch him!
Hypocrit and coward.
reply
Is an idiot that doesn't know or want to understand how SN works.
reply
Darth says- 'people think that by attaching an external wallet, will earn sats. Wrong, they will lose more sats than earning.'
This is not correct. People attach a wallet knowing that enables them to send and receive sats. They are now participating in one of the very few global BTC circular economies and communities available. For many of us this is the ONLY BTC circular economy we can access, participate in and learn to use BTC wallets on. SNs was literally created to enable this.
You @DarthCoin are refusing to participate- preferring to sling shitcoin CCs and risk losing any of your precious sats.
What a fucking hypocrit miserly cunt.
How will any BTC circular economy ever evolve if people think and act in this way?
Answer- IT NEVER WILL YOU IDIOT!
You have claimed to live entirely off the fiat system instead only using BTC- I call that bullshit as it is entirely inconsistent with your stated refusal to participate in Stacker News BTC MoE.
You appear to be both a liar and a hypocrit.
reply
reply
Fall back on idiotic memes because you are incapable of a credible reasoned response.
reply