pull down to refresh
101 sats \ 15 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 15 Dec \ on: Need ideas for creating couple of markets for "StackerNews 2026" on Predyx. oracle
These two markets are a scam! The premise should be 1.4M/1.5M paid items.
The premise should be 1.4M/1.5M paid items.
Paid items could be an excellent resolution criteria for 2026.
reply
Even so, it’s still possible to manipulate, but at least it wasn’t free.
reply
With your logic every market can be manipulated. Even the 2028 Elections, Super Bowl 2026 - all of it can be manipulated provided how much capital you can deploy to turn the odds in your favor.
reply
True. That’s why I think all bets are a scam, and I don’t spend a single sat! Hahaha. But these two, you can manipulate for free, a total oasis for scammers! I don’t think this is good for the Predyx brand.
edited: @mega_dreamerreply
edited: @mega_dreamer I don’t think this is good for the Predyx brand
I don't think so - but thanks for sharing your opinion.
reply
Running bots are not free, it requires computing power and skills. If the cost of running bots are lower than your potential win than people will attempt it.
That's why bitcoin's security comes for compute and energy spend.
Ultimately it all boils down to "cost and benefit"
reply
I don’t think you get it yet, you can create unpaid items (for free) on SN, and those items are counted for these two markets.
reply
I get it - what I'm trying to tell you is that it takes effort (cost in terms of time spent) to create unpaid item.
reply
I think that cost is irrelevant in this case. Imagine if all markets only had the cost of developing a script! It’d be a party with zero credibility!