pull down to refresh

It seems like you've done a great job, given that you don't have overlapping trades resolved. Couple of nits tho: I always hated when people write the price axis with a slash in there. I can't help reading your CC/Sat as 'CC per sat' when you really mean 'sat per CC'. I know its quite common to write it like that, but its a conversion factor so maybe you could write it as CC-sat, CC.sat, or even something like CC->sat. In the first line of text under the chart, you even refer to these prices as 'sats/CC'!
Also, why are the volumes on the chart up in the millions??
Also, why are the volumes on the chart up in the millions??
Einstein asked me the same question, lol. It is because the mixed types of offers, volume-based and rate-based, are all coming together in the charts. Make it so confusing, I know, still figuring out a way to homogenize the data somehow.
Regarding the CC/SAT, you are totally right. I'll make the chage asap, can't update this post anymore, but is great small detail to keep in mind for the future.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @harrym 2h
oops. i was looking at an older version of the orders. forget the comment about the volumes being in the millions!
reply