I'm going to try to post regularly on the developments in the Charlie Kirk assassination. It's the only way I can justify spending the amount of time that I do on this topic.
And along the lines of "the perfect is the enemy of the good", I'm just going to jump right in, and not give a huge summary of everything that's been going on. But bottom line, many people don't believe the official story (Fedslop) and are coming up with more likely alternatives.
Below is the latest video I watched from Baron Coleman. He’s doing great work on researching the real story on the CK assassination
Summary:
- Originally there were a lot of theories because there were so many odd things happening in the crowd. Lot of things happened, RIGHT at the moment that CK was shot. People holding what looked like phone guns in their hands, people making weird movements right at that moment. This was mostly red herrings, misdirection. Though of course these people were in on it.
- There’s some very high quality footage of Brian Harpole (CK security guy) twisting something in his pocket. For the video, see Blake Bednarz on X.com (below). The theory is that he was arming a device that then blew up on CK. It was disguised in his mic. It also caused a disturbance in the audio/visuals. There was also apparently a burn about the size of an index card on CK’s chest, supposedly from the device.
- The Baron Coleman video is long, you don’t have to watch the whole thing. It’s 3 hours, but the last 2 hours are him reading comments from supporters. Or maybe look at the original video with Blake Bednarz on x.com.
What is Charlie Kirk's Security Man Brian Harpole Twisting and Squeezing at the Big Bang? - #33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNMhPqZZWNM&t=6312s
Also I thought this was very interesting - basically theorizing that Charlies well-documented opposition to the US attacking Iran on behalf of Israel was the biggest reason he was murdered. He went to Trump in person to argue against the attack, along with Tucker Carlson. Apparently that was the reason it was a much more limited attack that what Israel wanted. https://x.com/Villgecrazylady/status/2002909817804116312
Sources: https://www.youtube.com/@RealCandaceO https://www.youtube.com/@realbaronpodcast https://x.com/BlakeBednarz/
@south_korea_ln @Undisciplined @OT @SimpleStacker @freetx @Scoresby @000w2 @siggy47 @justin_shocknet
One thing I forgot to mention - the Israeli government has a history of using explosives in electronic devices. Remember operation "Grim Beeper"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Lebanon_electronic_device_attacks
For anyone interested, Clint Russel has been doing great coverage of this too.
https://fountain.fm/show/nUTYcMtl4yMuoKHljZWu
Yeah, I should listen to his recent interview with Baron Coleman. I don't think any of these guys are going to let this go...at least, until the next "thing".
Which looks like it may be another attack on Iran. Or maybe WWIII, who knows.
If Candace is sincerely seeking justice for one of her best friends then I doubt she’ll ever let it go
So, are you starting to believe the conspiracies? On its face it seems outlandish to me, but I haven't done any of my own digging.
There’s no particular theory that I’ve adopted, just lots of peculiarities.
The most recent one that struck me as highly significant was Erika Kirk confirming that Charlie was messaging people that he knew this was coming in the days before.
I haven’t listened to the interview that came from for myself yet, but it was a major backtracking of Erika’s previous denial that those messages had been made.
The Tyler Robinson lone nut shooter hypothesis doesn’t make much sense if Charlie knew he was under immediate threat, seemingly because of his breaking from his donors on Israel.
There are tons of details that don’t add up and that should be reasonably easy to address, also evidence going missing mysteriously.
Basically, the only existing evidence for the official narrative is “Trust me bro” from one of the most notoriously dishonest organizations in the world.
My biggest initial opposition to the theory was that there seemed to be bigger targets to go after. But now that Tucker has become persona non grata among the conservative moneyed elite (and Candace has been for a while), it does make me wonder a bit more. Tucker's fall from conservative graces actually seemed so swift as to be manufactured. Given his media savvy, there's no way he didn't know that interviewing Nick Fuentes would trigger the backlash that it did.
@delete in 24 hours
Also don't forget the Iran angle. What does Israel really, really want? For the US to go into a regime change war in Iran.
Who were some of the most influential opponents to this - to the previous attack, at least? Charlie Kirk and Tucker Carlson.
Yeah, I'm not ready to say that I've landed on any beliefs yet. Only that I'm slightly more open to alternative interpretations than before.
@delete in 24 hours
I stand by what I said in previous threads, if this was an op it's big enough for the scene to be just a stage... like an arranged marriage to Erika and Charlie is still alive doing spook things behind the scenes
If it's not that big then it's your average patsie situation and the feds aren't going to spill then beans on foreign intel handlers
https://twiiit.com/Villgecrazylady/status/2002909817804116312