1 sat \ 2 replies \ @JeremyRubin 9 Mar 2022 \ parent \ on: @niftynei AMA: lightning, FOSS, bitcoin, leveling up the next 100 btc devs at Base58 bitcoin
doesn't getting rid of state work with just AJ's proposal from https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2021-October/003278.html
should everyone be focused on that?
w.r.t. musig being the barrier, could we just start using Taproot with a NUMS point and a traditional multisig & still get this benefit?
write
preview
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @niftynei OP 9 Mar 2022
i feel like you're using this as an opportunity to propose your own solutions rather than asking my insight about something i actually have good context for
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @JeremyRubin 10 Mar 2022
i think you're presuming bad faith -- i asked an open ended question, and asked a follow up. you could have responded with anything -- you said eltoo, and said for the purposes of state compaction being the issue. in the ranking of all problems i didn't think that was so severe. i'm mostly an outsider to lightning development, and AJ's proposal has nothing to do with anything i work on. but if it's a solution for state compaction you didn't know about, that's groovy and i hope useful information. if it's not, i'd love to learn why you don't think so.
reply