pull down to refresh

Obviously bad content is bad

can we take this as a given when the aim is to define 'slop'? On the venn diagram of a typical social media feed, what is bad and what is slop would have a significant portion that overlap, wouldn't they?

To judge something as slop is to judge it as 'bad', I mean it feels the same. Maybe you wouldn't use the word, but all-in-all, I think you have a disgust response to slop if you don't like slop. And this would be hard to distinguish from a judgement of a generic piece of media as 'bad'. I'm saying it's possible to separate them, but you might as well not because they feel the same.

This is interesting, and I think there's more to define to be precise. So can we define 'bad' when we see it?

Still, I imagine that definition would look similar to the reasons given here for why we don't like slop: insincerity, poor quality, etc.

This is my fault. For the most part I use slop = AI content.

If AI content quality were equivalent to something human written, on what other grounds could we dislike it?

reply
on what other grounds could we dislike it

the intent with which it was made maybe

reply