pull down to refresh

From what I can tell, based on an eyeball test, things seem pretty healthy.

At scale, I suspect incentivizing downzaps would be most of what's required.

Scale is also usually a FUD-y thing. Evoking it sounds smarter than it is. haha, when the complexity of the system explodes and is relatively unpredictable, I predict xyz

Fair enough. I'm not even thinking about complexity exploding, though. Any improvement to what's relevant to me matters more when there's more stuff to choose from.

reply
69 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 8 Jan

True. If content added and sats zapped/boosted do not scale proportionally, then seeing relevant stuff may suffer.

reply

It's not about sats zapped/boosted scaling proportionally. It's about the likelihood that an aggregation of more preference sets over more items will be less reflective of my own preferences.

Trust helps to apply my preferences to the things I haven't seen yet.

reply