Totally fair. Not wanting to repost a fake is healthy. I respect that instinct.
And I don’t think “must be fake” is only vanity. Sometimes it’s just caution. But the bigger point is: the pattern is real even if this specific document isn’t. The fact that it feels plausible tells us something.
On “more of the same”: style-wise, maybe. Consequence-wise, no. Personal grievance as policy + alliance as entitlement + “security” as a blank check for maximal control isn’t standard-issue politics.
So yeah: post it with a guardrail,“unverified screenshot, could be fake, but why does it feel so believable?”
Totally fair. Not wanting to repost a fake is healthy. I respect that instinct.
And I don’t think “must be fake” is only vanity. Sometimes it’s just caution. But the bigger point is: the pattern is real even if this specific document isn’t. The fact that it feels plausible tells us something.
On “more of the same”: style-wise, maybe. Consequence-wise, no. Personal grievance as policy + alliance as entitlement + “security” as a blank check for maximal control isn’t standard-issue politics.
So yeah: post it with a guardrail,“unverified screenshot, could be fake, but why does it feel so believable?”