pull down to refresh

38 sats \ 5 replies \ @028559d218 28 Jan \ parent \ on: dathonohm releases BIP 110/RDTS activation client v0.1 bitcoin

It's a hard fork, they just somehow think they're 'going to win'.
The bcashers thought the same

write
preview
110 sats \ 2 replies \ @BallLightning 28 Jan

It's a soft fork.

reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 28 Jan

A soft fork can still produce a chain split.

If miners do not enforce BIP 110, nodes running BIP 110 will fork off from the main chain in September.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BallLightning 28 Jan

Yeah, I know.

reply
360 sats \ 1 reply \ @dathon_ohm 28 Jan

BIP-110 is much closer to Segwit than to BCH, given that Segwit was a softfork, while BCH was a hardfork.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Filiprogrammer 28 Jan

True.
And also BCH enabled much bigger blocks, which hurts decentralization. Meanwhile BIP-110 aims to do the opposite by reducing block bloat caused by inscriptions.
So the comparison to BCH makes no sense.

reply