Also: the attacker is necessarily a miner. What differentiates a "good" miner from an attacker?

*I think* my answer is that an attacker could only be someone who intends to cause chaos by constant reorgs.

Scoresby

If hashpower declines (because those miners are moving into a new business) how secure does the network remain?

If miners don't think it's worth the electricity cost, why would an attacker?

bitcoin

econ

The Finance Bros get their first taste of winter and the frost monsters are here

> If hashpower declines (because those miners are moving into a new business) how secure does the network remain?

If miners don't think it's worth the electricity cost, why would an attacker?