pull down to refresh

Maybe I'm making assumptions...
But isn't PGP-signing commits especially Bitcoin software... like basically mandatory? Your PGP key is basically who you are on the internet.

Your PGP key is basically who you are on the internet.

Not really.. It's just a cryptographic key. They expire, get lost, get stolen... so it's not "your identity".

For large public-facing repos it's unwise to rely on every individual contributor's security, so you don't build a process around that because if the process fails with one contributor leaking their keys, you're screwed. Instead you:

  1. Have pgp sigs on merge commits and tags
  2. Validate these
  3. Always be vigilant

If you have an active community, issues will be spotted. If you don't, you have to do the work yourself.

reply

We use SSH that verifies in the same way, PGP wouldn't have changed anything, a botched branch rule on one repo was the gap in preventing the push at all ... and vigilance mode would have flagged it more visibly

We don't distribute binaries that would need a signed hash

reply