I think that it's the thing they don't get meaningful competition on simply because there is no one with that kind of funding that wants to solve science problems.

What's ironic is that that outcome, though pretty much undesired judging by other efforts that seem to be haunted by failures, is more in line with the non-profit structure it started as than the financial atrocity it is at the moment.

As much as I dislike Sam Altman, I still hope they're going to make some comebacks.

optimism

If that's their business model, they haven't chosen the market with the largest number of users, that's for sure~~

I read recently that a lot of the math stuff news from openAI was not really new science. E.g. with the erdos problems, it turned out to be problems with forgotten solutions that chatgpt had unearthed again.

A recent paper this week with never before published problems was posted to challenge chatgpt at truly tackling new science. Will have to look for it. Or i guess I'll just wait to be notified of the outcome of this challenge.

science

GPT‑5.2 derives a new result in theoretical physics

south_korea_ln

If that's their business model, they haven't chosen the market with the largest number of users, that's for sure~~ 

I read recently that a lot of the math stuff news from openAI was not really new science. E.g. with the erdos problems, it turned out to be problems with forgotten solutions that chatgpt had unearthed again.

A recent paper this week with never before published problems was posted to challenge chatgpt at truly tackling new science. Will have to look for it. Or i guess I'll just wait to be notified of the outcome of this challenge.