pull down to refresh
My reply directly above is to @optimism
In response to your wondering what this has to do with Copernicus- very little - it has much more to do with the OPs deliberate undermining of the use of P2P sat denominated transactions here on Stacker News.
Thus all of @optimism s content is tainted especially where the OP is asserting 'Copernicus would have been a Bitcoiner', when the OP is themself undermining the sats denominated ethos and economy of this platform.
Im not sure what this has to do with my comment, but just a heads up that I’m only downzapping because it’s just hard to understand what it has to do with Copernicus. No feelings hurt over here. I just figure if it’s confusing to me, it’s gotta be confusing to folks just wandering in. Keep bringing on the weird! I still got some sats left. :)