My nostr profile is going to end up being nothing but posts of my game results if I keep testing this myself, so for the rest of today (and maybe tomorrow), anybody that posts a unique note of TURTLE game results and shares what signer they made it with gets 1000 sats (minus sn fee I think). Please comment with the actual note and not just a picture of it. Limit is one bounty per stacker and per nostr profile.
Heads up, you will not be able to do this without a nostr signer in the browser. Bonus sats or love (no promise of which) guaranteed for any feedback. :)
1,000 sats paid 6 times
https://njump.to/7a03f29383cf5684834d88f3f56f1cabfae60b93f1d5c92689f40bd868a4e6d3
Here you go. My suggestion would be to add the Spanish language. I used Keychat for this.
Thanks! Bounty rewarded!
Spanish actually already is an option! When you play any language that's not English, the strategy is also a little different as well because I allow nonsense word guesses.
I actually have a separate bounty out for anybody that finds Spanish answers that I uploaded that aren't real. In other words, you can guess nonsense words but all of the answers are real, but sense I'm not a native speaker I'm not 100% sure that I got that right.
Nice, I tried some games in Spanish now. Thanks for the sats and CC
Used my real nsec, signed with firefox alby extension.
Failed to get the word.
Used the share button to post it, it worked!
Nice game! I first found it today when I saw this post trending on SN.
Nice! Thanks for helping out!
Thanks for the s̶a̶t̶s̶! CCs!
Any idea why it says I received 1023 sats for my post, but yet my balance only shows 751? I know there was a change from sats to CCs a while back. That difference I was (kinda) okay with. But 1023-751 = 272 missing CCs is concerning. I poked around in my SN balance... didn't see any obvious reasoning for them disappearing.
Yeah, sn takes a 30% cut of all of our zaps and bounties and what-not on here.
https://njump.to/d1d506719c0b269a8cf8b1abcee4d14ea42e55e7464a2e9f9091de785946657e
woohoo! had a good one too
Nice! Looks like a killer round too!
I played but it didn't let me share the result on Nostr 😓
So the way I currently have it setup, you need to have the nostr signer in a browser extension. I'm assuming that's why you weren't offered the nostr post and I'm hoping to fix this soon though.
Ok added nos2x to Firefox
https://njump.to/06cf1ef6846cdd9d4fccdde5cbe4ece4dfb527f488e60d3f2864a6b03ba07fe4
Used a fake nsec
And failed to get the word
But managed to see the share button
Cool game
Also to note, I have kill everything exit on Firefox, wipes all data history etc, so bypasses the Ln invoice
Just so you know, there's a way to game it for free
Awesome! Bounty rewarded.
Thanks!
Yeah, I know. I figure anybody that's really serious about saving 100 sats can play for free, at least for now.
TY ser 🫡
Well, here you have it ;)
Awesome, thanks so much for posting! Obviously, you earned the bounty, but I’ve actually baked in an ability for the game to post a note by a single click if you play it from a browser with a nostr signer installed. Anyway, thanks again for sharing it! I just wanted to mention for other folks trying that I’m really trying to make sure these notes which I auto-generate at the end of the game work.
Oh! I've missed that... here you go ;) is working! I suggest to use
njump.toinstead of.me, it will redirect to one of the servershttps://njump.to/4a4bf410102e3fcfebae71d9689844eb8bf6acfdeb85c203d71cc2ae09498a67
If you find a way to attach a screenshot of the completed game would be really cool
Thank you! That's the kind of feedback I need to. I switch to .to and will think about the screenshot.
AHHHH Too late to edit. I meant too! I meant too! I now have a typo-induced brainfreeze.
TI'd Tried with keychat signer, nos2x, amber couldn't see a sign Iin anywhere
After you finish the game, there is a "share to nostr" button. Up until that moment, you don't need the signer.
Also, if you haven't already started generating stats that you want to keep, refresh your cookies so you can still get your free game for the day since I'm guessing you've already left the site.
isn't it "sats, CC's, or love?"
in the cowboy land, which wud u fuck, marry, kill?
Boosted baby! Bring the downzaps!
OP is a Bitcoiner promoting LN but cant be fucked to attach LN wallets to their SNs account or is concealing wallets?
Where is your PoW that you are serious and genuine about using LN here on SNs OP?
What is Stacker News?
It is a social media platform intentionally created to enable a P2P V4V BTC denominated community.
Originally Stacker News (SN) custodyed sats on behalf of participants but the threat of government regulatory prosecution on the pretext of money transmitter forced a move away from the custody of sats by the platform to the platform enabling participants to send sats via their wallets.
To achieve this participants need to attach wallets to both send and receive sats.
Where participants do not or cannot attach LN wallets transactions will often default to Cowboy Credits.
This change was a compromise forced by the threat of government prosecution.
The difficulty of attaching both sending and receiving wallets is moderate- it takes some effort and newbie or non tech people may struggle with it, but most competent Bitcoiners can succeed in attaching wallets and thus enabling sats denominated P2P transactions.
But a number of Stackers have chosen not to attach wallets- in particular sending wallets which enable you to send sats into the SN community.
Very few have attached just a sending wallet- many have attach just a receiving wallet.
Those who only attach a receiving wallet can receive sats from others but cannot send sats into the community. They may feel that as content providers they have no need or obligation to send sats into and within the SN community. I disagree.
Where these receive but not send (horse but no gun) Stackers proclaim to be Bitcoiners but refuse to enable a sending wallet they are demonstrably hypocrits. They claim they want to build and grow the BTC LN MoE network but they cannot be bothered contributing toward that growth by attaching a sending wallet and demonstrating they are not just talking, but are also walking and supporting a sats denominated platform.
If we do not use the LN wherever and whenever we can it will not grow and develop.
Some claim it is too hard to attach wallets- its too hard on their self custody nodes or wallets- this just highlights how much work the LN still needs before it is capable of anything approaching 100% reliable MoE capability.
But the best way to grow and strengthen the LN is it use it – despite its remaining flaws and glitches.
When wallets are supported by people using them they receives transaction fees and can develop liquidity and systems further.
When LN wallets are not used the LN decays- it does not have the usage and fees income to grow.
So when self proclaimed advocates for BTC and LN refuse to attach wallets (especially sending wallets) I see hypocrit.
I will continue to see hypocrit until and unless someone can explain why I should not.
Calling me a Nazi, trolling and making fun of me crudely seeking to avoid the issues I raise will not stop me from asking why are you claiming to be a Bitcoiner but refusing to attach wallets and use the LN here where we can help it grow.
Now some are deliberately concealing their wallet status, as if this is about a right to privacy.
Concealing your wallet status means nobody else can verify whether or not you are serious about using BTC LN, or whether you are just an all talk no walk hypocrit.
Do not trust- verify.
What about this fundamental principle do they not understand?
And then they talk about 'content' being more important than whether or not you have attached wallets - in this context the intentional lack of attached wallets undermines your credibility as your actions do not match your words.
Your submitted content may be great, but you as someone claiming to be a serious Bitcoiner are undermining your credibility and the credibility of your content by being a hypocrit.
Your content, is tainted by your verifiable hypocrisy.
SNs needs both good content providers and those who pay for that content if it is succeed.
I am more in the latter group than the former but both are required overall or the model does not work.
So as a net contributor of sats and thus a net consumer of content I object where content providers refuse to engage in the P2P V4V ethos by refusing to attach both sending and receiving wallets and I will both withhold my contribution of sats and sometimes downvote in response.
V4V needs to work reciprocally or it will not work at all.
The content providers need net sats contributors/content consumers who send sats into the platform, or the entire platform fails.