Would you define someone posturing as a serious Bitcoiner but failing to attach or show and use LN wallets as a scammer? I would. And I downzap them.
You can downzap them too. Put you sats where your mouth and ideals are instead of trying to change the rules to suit censorship and parasites who are debasing the SNs sats economy and ethos.
This is V4V and money is the moderator.
Why don't you attach a sending wallet?
Without a wallet attached nobody can know if you ever use LN to zap- without a sending wallet attached the default is for you to be sending a lot of CCs and very few sats.
In contrast with a sending wallet attached you send sats over LN as often as is possible under the current hybrid CC/sats system.
You assert we are all in this together- the evidence says very much to the contrary.
How do we stop spam and scams?
Would you define someone posturing as a serious Bitcoiner but failing to attach or show and use LN wallets as a scammer? I would. And I downzap them.
You can downzap them too. Put you sats where your mouth and ideals are instead of trying to change the rules to suit censorship and parasites who are debasing the SNs sats economy and ethos.
This is V4V and money is the moderator.
Why don't you attach a sending wallet?
Without a wallet attached nobody can know if you ever use LN to zap- without a sending wallet attached the default is for you to be sending a lot of CCs and very few sats.
In contrast with a sending wallet attached you send sats over LN as often as is possible under the current hybrid CC/sats system.
You assert we are all in this together- the evidence says very much to the contrary.