pull down to refresh

159 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 22 Feb \ parent \ on: The Economics of Downzapping: Transaction Costs, Custody, and Solomon's Nonsense meta econ
I doubt we're far from 10 stackers averaging 10k

4 on track this month, 5 in January, 3 in December.

100 stackers averaging 1k

26 this month thus far

1k stackers averaging 100

65 this month (edit)

241 for 10 or up

(400 under 10)

write
compose
113 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 22 Feb

I meant it in the sense of it wouldn't take much to get there, especially if we start zapping harder to elevate signal through this extra noise, which we can afford because the noise is filling our bags.

reply
48 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 22 Feb
especially if we start zapping harder to elevate signal through this extra noise

I think some of us are already doing this. I totally lost some posts on my own territory earlier though, lol.

reply
158 sats \ 1 reply \ @adlai 23 Feb

I've been zapping much more.

My zaps are usually below the average, because I rarely see comments early enough to bet on rewards, so my heuristic is usually just to zap away CCs and rewards from the days when I do get those; however I've been more active, and have somewhat improved the standards to which I hold myself, so I thus have more zapping to do.

reply
108 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 23 Feb

The earliness standard is very aggressive. I think k00b is considering adjusting it to something that’s more compatible with the new Lit system.

reply
208 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 22 Feb

We'll probably have to start using more SN features, like subscriptions and actually visiting our favorite territories.

More robust habits will serve us well at scale, anyway.

reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 22 Feb

Yes, I subscribed some more too

reply