>> I've been through this, but I always end up muting them again.
>
> Same.

I've begun thinking there should be two kinds of mute. I keep lots of stackers on mute with whom I still correspond after viewing their comments, however keeping them muted gives me a way of controlling the order in which I read comments that is impervious to zapularity.

adlai

I think people feel less responsible for their code now, just because an LLM wrote it for them.

Less at stake, because just blame the bot. But the avalanche of slop will influence culture the other way around ultimately: there is no longer any reason to deliver buggy code anymore. Get it right or gtfo.

I've been through this, but I always end up muting them again.

Same. This is why I'm okay with this. I don't care if other people interact with those I muted; I don't need to downzap anything but scammers (and sloppy stuff, on my territory, because I said I'd do that)

mutenuke: never see 'reply from someone you muted' again

> I think people feel less responsible for their code now, just because an LLM wrote it for them.

Less at stake, because just blame the bot. But the avalanche of slop will influence culture the other way around ultimately: there is no longer any reason to deliver buggy code anymore. Get it right or gtfo.

> It solved my problem.

Mine too, thank you.

> I've been through this, but I always end up muting them again.

Same. This is why I'm okay with this. I don't care if other people interact with those I muted; I don't need to downzap anything but scammers (and sloppy stuff, on my territory, because I said I'd do that)