pull down to refresh
P.S. If Stacker News still sees its sats denominated nature as a priority then the ability of content providers to conceal their wallet status needs to be removed.
This does not force anyone to do anything.
But it would give content consumers like me the ability to verify whether or not content providers are walking the talk regarding LN use and adoption.
If SNs is to ever be a viable economic unit it needs the input of content consumers zapping sats into the SNs economy.
Content consumers cannot do that from an informed perspective if they do not know the wallet status of content providers.
If someone is rarely or never posting LN adoption content or is simply not interested in LN adoption then having, or not having LN wallets is not hypocrisy.
I no zero problem with either.
I just don't want to spend sats on content providers who display hypocrisy regarding LN.
You are totally wrong: SN is not a V4V platform. Is just a "pay to post" forum.
What are zaps for then?
Moderation of forums with money is an intrinsic part of the V4V model, as is paying to post.
I am tired of your idiocy and your useless vendetta against CCs. Is totally idiotic what are you doing. This is just noise, not value.
So please fuck off.
Same to you.
Agree nobody needs to prove anything to anyone, but my question is whether -
'content consumers cannot reasonably expect to have any way of verifying that content providers who frequently post Bitcoin/LN related content are acting in a way consistent with their rhetoric by attaching and showing attached LN wallets?'
Seems are different views on this within SNs developers but that Stacker News as a whole can no longer be seen as working to build a V4V platform using, as much as possible, sats as the MoE.