I don't like it and found it incredibly frustrating yet interesting. We don't have immediate plans to deviate from the `money is the moderator` experiment. 

The problem is one of outliers. Mods and trust are the usual way forums deal with outliers, which we can always introduce. For now, we want to deal with problems as surgically as we can. Stackers can see when there are aggressive upzaps but aggressive downzaps hide their effects so this new sort is aimed at helping that.

I'd be happy to answer any specific questions if you have them.

Are you going to share your thoughts about the aggressive downzapping?

Undisciplined

I'll be making an update to bounties this week that I think ~Stacker_Sports will very much appreciate.

grayruby

Opposes a consensus of stackers in magnitude and is motivated by something other than the content.

Out of curiosity: What makes a downzap aggressive?

unboiled

 for anyone interested in joining the fight against aggressive downzappers. This should satiate 

We've also made it so that when zaps are split, aka forwarded, on posts, the recipient of the largest share that is able to receive sats via a not-custodial zap, will receive sats.

To declutter things, I've moved the extra cowboy badges (gun and horse) to profile pages.

There are few other minor things too but they aren't worth mentioning.

meta

We've added [/top/posts/day?by=downsats](https://stacker.news/top/posts/day?by=downsats) for anyone interested in joining the fight against aggressive downzappers. This should satiate [calls for a new sort](https://stacker.news/items/1440269/r/k00b).

We've also made it so that when zaps are split, aka forwarded, on posts, the recipient of the largest share that is able to receive sats via a not-custodial zap, will receive sats.

To declutter things, I've moved the extra cowboy badges (gun and horse) to profile pages.

There are few other minor things too but they aren't worth mentioning.