Sam Altman skipped the don't be evil step

SimpleStacker

Also, @justin_shocknet beat me to it:

https://stacker.news/items/1444092/r/Scoresby?commentId=1444334

Scoresby

It doesn't make sense. Domestic mass surveillance is *supposed* to be illegal. And what is the purpose of the surveillance anyway?

> Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.

... aren't these also what Anthropic wanted?

adlai

"If the govt says you don't need a gun, you definitely need a gun" (maybe 2) :-)
They already spying on us, so why the facade? "Oh well, but now we at least told you we won't spy on you"...
One big farce is what this is.... imho

JesseJames

> I wonder if this is at all connected to the fact that OpenAI just announced this AM that they raised $110b

It's connected to https://stacker.news/items/1444092/r/optimism

optimism

https://twiiit.com/sama/status/2027578652477821175

nitter

I get the ‘serve humanity’ angle, but this is definitely one of those complicated moments.

Ohtis

In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.

AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.  The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.

We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.

We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.

We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

I wonder if this is at all connected to the fact that OpenAI just announced this AM that they raised $110b.

![](https://m.stacker.news/132313)


> In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome.
>  
> AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.  The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement.
>  
> We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only.
>  
> We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.
>  
> We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

I wonder if this is at all connected to the fact that OpenAI just announced this AM that they raised $110b.