pull down to refresh

Set the motive talk aside. Your claim is causal. The study says results “do not imply a causal relationship.” Show evidence that isolates language itself, not correlation.

Alright, bro, I don't think it's productive to speak any longer. I provided evidence and a clear causal channel, you provided no alternative hypothesis and merely resorted to hyperskepticism. I may not be able to convince you to admit to even the possibility of a causal relationship, but at least anyone who reads this thread can see the evidence now.

reply

Correlation shown. The study says it

"does not imply a causal relationship.”

Causation was asserted, not established.

reply