pull down to refresh

The networks need to have separate fates. BitDNS users might be completely liberal about adding any large data features since relatively few domain registrars are needed, while Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.

satoshi, December 10th 2010
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1790.msg28917#msg28917

This "spaces" scam is by NOT what bitdns did. I am old enough to know and tested the defunct Namecoin NMC that was a good intention of decentralizing DNS.

But these "spaces" are just another scam. Don't let them fool you.
They even used a catchy title for this post, showing the level of scam they are willing to do.
You have been warned.

reply
124 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca98am79 14h

Namecoin failed because of distribution issues, among other reasons: https://www.cs.princeton.edu/~arvindn/publications/namespaces.pdf

reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 14h

Spaces uses approx. 60 bytes, very minimal on chain footprint. Compatible with core, knots, bip110, etc. Very tiny without any changes needed to Bitcoin.

Satoshi would approve!

reply