pull down to refresh
Yes, two-boxer.
I think the paradox comes because we have to assume an impossible precondition. An accurate predictor cannot exist as postulated. If it exists, our current understanding of the world is wrong.
It reminds me of Pascal's wager, and one-boxing is believing the predictor can exist.
Yes, two-boxer.
I think the paradox comes because we have to assume an impossible precondition. An accurate predictor cannot exist as postulated. If it exists, our current understanding of the world is wrong.