pull down to refresh
None of the AI power users on my X feed care about Gensyn or any of the other projects prioritizing inference verifiability.
How many decentralized inference power users are there? What kinds of customers want such inference? I'm curious which use cases experience such an inference shortage that they'll pay for it even when unverfiable and unaccountable.
Not to trivialize its importance, just rather focus on network growth first & upgrade later.
That makes sense. Overcooking is worse than undercooking. I'm probably out of the target demographic because you wouldn't be doing it this way if probably-inference didn't have value.
reply
How many decentralized inference power users are there?
Sadly not enough to build a big business around!
reply
reply
For now our approach will be to let others solve the core technical issue and absorb that into our code when we need it
For example last week this CommitLLM project came out with a proposed solution some people seem excited about
We ask Codex to audit their approach, compare to what we have already in Psionic, propose integration path etc.
That comes up with a decent analysis:
https://github.com/OpenAgentsInc/psionic/blob/main/docs/audits/2026-04-09-psionic-commitllm-adaptation-audit.md
May or may not proceed with that specific plan but will repeat the process whenever we need that level of verifiability, then port the code into Psionic and iterate as needed
Generally I don't expect verifiability to be a big enough selling point that people will prefer a different project over ours because they verify more than we do. None of the AI power users on my X feed care about Gensyn or any of the other projects prioritizing inference verifiability.
Not to trivialize its importance, just rather focus on network growth first & upgrade later. (Borrowing from Nostr's 'worse is better' playbook)