pull down to refresh

4 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 12 Apr \ parent \ on: What year does avoiding a soft fork become riskier than implementing one? bitcoin AskSN lightning

Have you looked at mandacaru (#1466811)?

write
compose
196 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 12 Apr

No, but I looked at utreexo.

My understanding is that with utreexo, instead of storing the utxo set in GBs (~/.bitcoin/chainstate), you can store it in a few MB with a merkle tree. You verify transactions with inclusion proofs for the outputs they spend. If you want to be a node to help other nodes sync, you would still need to store the blocks (~/.bitcoin/blocks).

Is that wrong?

reply