I tend toward believing you but hope you can understand my position which is that I cannot concretely verify what is the truth here as I do not have access to the data. Only SNs, probably @koob might have access to the definitive data? I dont have access to it and have asked if @koob can provide it with no response at this point in time.
Am more than happy to spend sats on a contest of ideas and for some of those sats to go to other content contributors and the platform that is enabling the content to be shared. That is of course the V$V Pay toPost model on which SNs is built. All good! I have just been surprised by how determined someone appears to be to downzap content raising the issue of The Greater Israel Project. Their determination to downzap makes me wonder if there really is something to 'The Greater Israel Project' that deserves exposure especially considering the current conflict - am really not sure as it seems quite far fetched. That is why I have responded as I have.
As I have described above if SNs was using CCs to downzap my post those CCs would generate sats input into the SN economy from my response and while as you say 70% of those sats would be passed on to territory owners via the rewards pool, 30% would remain with SNs. In addition many of the 70% sats received by territories would be used to pay rent on those territories or otherwise be spent within SNs.
It could be a way of 'quantitative easing' and stimulating the SNs economy, at my cost! Quitting is often portrayed as an easy solution and on the surface of course it is, but its not usually my preferred option...in my experience greater rewards are found with perserverance.
I tend toward believing you but hope you can understand my position which is that I cannot concretely verify what is the truth here as I do not have access to the data.
Only SNs, probably @koob might have access to the definitive data?
I dont have access to it and have asked if @koob can provide it with no response at this point in time.
Am more than happy to spend sats on a contest of ideas and for some of those sats to go to other content contributors and the platform that is enabling the content to be shared. That is of course the V$V Pay toPost model on which SNs is built. All good!
I have just been surprised by how determined someone appears to be to downzap content raising the issue of The Greater Israel Project.
Their determination to downzap makes me wonder if there really is something to 'The Greater Israel Project' that deserves exposure especially considering the current conflict - am really not sure as it seems quite far fetched. That is why I have responded as I have.
As I have described above if SNs was using CCs to downzap my post those CCs would generate sats input into the SN economy from my response and while as you say 70% of those sats would be passed on to territory owners via the rewards pool, 30% would remain with SNs. In addition many of the 70% sats received by territories would be used to pay rent on those territories or otherwise be spent within SNs.
It could be a way of 'quantitative easing' and stimulating the SNs economy, at my cost!
Quitting is often portrayed as an easy solution and on the surface of course it is, but its not usually my preferred option...in my experience greater rewards are found with perserverance.