we might say that economic nodes exert, at least, a large amount of control over the network. as far as i know, Microstrategy doesn't even hold their own keys, so the question is probably applying to whoever is holding their bitcoin for them.
i think if one actor holds 10 million bitcoin, it would be pretty horrible for the network. when a soft fork comes along, it's hard to see how the guys buying most of the bitcoin wouldn't be determine which side of the fork ends up being "the real" bitcoin.
I'm not trying to be rude but this question gets really old. There is no number. What is the worry? Honestly, if you want to worry about this, the worry should not be with Strategy but rather the rest of the world for not buying it up first.
Never. They don't control the network and bitcoin doesn't care if that company is successful or not.
we might say that economic nodes exert, at least, a large amount of control over the network. as far as i know, Microstrategy doesn't even hold their own keys, so the question is probably applying to whoever is holding their bitcoin for them.
i think if one actor holds 10 million bitcoin, it would be pretty horrible for the network. when a soft fork comes along, it's hard to see how the guys buying most of the bitcoin wouldn't be determine which side of the fork ends up being "the real" bitcoin.
I believe it's Coinbase.
In my opinion, it is already worrisome.
You should be more concerned about exchanges.
a while back
Always be worried live in pure fear and catastrophic euphoria
I'm not trying to be rude but this question gets really old. There is no number. What is the worry? Honestly, if you want to worry about this, the worry should not be with Strategy but rather the rest of the world for not buying it up first.