Disagree and is a fundamentally bad idea to have more implementations, especially for consensus sensitive or contentious fighting features in distributed software! Satoshi warned against multiple implementations. They are a menace. Selling it as a “monopoly” is foolish, rather, other implantations are parasitic and seek to subvert or control the host. We have multiple examples of this in history.
At best it is fragmenting, at worst, a attempted hostile takeover like we have seen from others.
The recent disruption and destruction of the commons has caused this tribalism, and if you are paying attention, you can see what’s going on here.
Are you itching for your own pet Bitcoin fork Jimmy?
Disagree and is a fundamentally bad idea to have more implementations, especially for consensus sensitive or contentious fighting features in distributed software! Satoshi warned against multiple implementations. They are a menace.
Selling it as a “monopoly” is foolish, rather, other implantations are parasitic and seek to subvert or control the host. We have multiple examples of this in history.
At best it is fragmenting, at worst, a attempted hostile takeover like we have seen from others.
The recent disruption and destruction of the commons has caused this tribalism, and if you are paying attention, you can see what’s going on here.
Are you itching for your own pet Bitcoin fork Jimmy?