pull down to refresh
I didn't misrepresent what you wrote. You said that the political system is mostly the elected representatives, when in reality it's mostly the voters.
Voters in America can choose from several parties. If they don't want one of those parties, they also have the option of writing in someone else's name.
Are you trying to say I'm not in control of my choice when I vote? Or are you trying to say my vote won't matter if I don't vote within the two prevailing parties?
I am saying the only voting options you have are mostly owned by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Bernie Sanders appears to be one of the very few options where voters in a US few states have an option to vote for someone not owned by corporate parasites.
The US political system is almost entirely stitched up by corporate patronage parasites.
Yes if you vote for other than the two main parties that vote is absolutely very unlikely to gain any meaningful representation in the US political system.
It is a protest vote at best but does not impact the corporate sponsored crony is and corruption that is now so deeply entrenched.
For example Trump is owned by Chevron and Zionists, among others...
Here is some documentary evidence for you to consider...
Bernie Sanders appears to be one of the very few options where voters in a US few states have an option to vote for someone not owned by corporate parasites.
So you prefer a government parasite over a corporate "parasite".Even though corporations produce things and pay workers, while the government takes from workers and produces nothing but strife in return.
Its not a question of my preferences- it is a matter of the very limited options available to US voters.
Chevron/Big Oil are profiteering from US consumers and Trump will do nothing to stop that because he is owned by Chevron.
Trumps war crimes in the middle east benefit his corporate sponsors, not US voters.
They can vote for anyone. The fact that Trump won the highest office without ever working in politics is indicative of it being an extremely open democracy.
Trumps war crimes in the middle east benefit his corporate sponsors, not US voters.
It greatly benefits the US to intercept as much of the PRC's oil supply as possible and bomb their proxy that was chanting "death to America." It's practically the first responsibility of the executive branch.
They can vote for anyone.
No, not really.
Most US voters have only a choice to vote for candidates already owned by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Someone like Trump.
Crony capitalism created by a 'democracy' debased by chronic parasitic corporate patronage.
What do you mean "not really"? They're allowed to vote for a dirty unaccomplished socialist hippy if they want. Hence Obama and Sanders and AOC and Mamdani. All of these people wholeheartedly support the PRC's goal of annexing Taiwan. The whole party explicitly runs against the ideals of capitalism.
Most US voters have only a choice to vote for candidates already owned by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Uncle Tom Obama was owned by the military Industrial complex just as much as, if not more, than Trump.
So you have named 3 politicians which MOST US voters are NOT able to vote for.
The US political system is effectively owned and operated by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Chinas Heavens Mandates system delivers better results for citizens as those in power in China know their necks will be severed if they do not deliver progress for the people.
I wrote-
'Your political system that is populated mostly by paid representatives of big oil, military contractors, Zionist bankers and other corporate parasites.'
ie - Nearly all your 'elected representatives' are paid and owned by corporates.
Voters can choose from two parties- both owned by the same corporate parasites with very little real difference in the ultimate outcome.
Yours is a corrupted and highly compromised democracy...and you cannot even see it because it has become so 'normalised'...Tragic.
Sanders is one of the very few exceptions- who speaks outside of a corporate captured narrative.
Please do not misrepresent what I wrote.
That is exactly the sort of behavour which degrades both those who practice it, and our democracies.