pull down to refresh
They can vote for anyone. The fact that Trump won the highest office without ever working in politics is indicative of it being an extremely open democracy.
Trumps war crimes in the middle east benefit his corporate sponsors, not US voters.
It greatly benefits the US to intercept as much of the PRC's oil supply as possible and bomb their proxy that was chanting "death to America." It's practically the first responsibility of the executive branch.
They can vote for anyone.
No, not really.
Most US voters have only a choice to vote for candidates already owned by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Someone like Trump.
Crony capitalism created by a 'democracy' debased by chronic parasitic corporate patronage.
What do you mean "not really"? They're allowed to vote for a dirty unaccomplished socialist hippy if they want. Hence Obama and Sanders and AOC and Mamdani. All of these people wholeheartedly support the PRC's goal of annexing Taiwan. The whole party explicitly runs against the ideals of capitalism.
Most US voters have only a choice to vote for candidates already owned by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Uncle Tom Obama was owned by the military Industrial complex just as much as, if not more, than Trump.
So you have named 3 politicians which MOST US voters are NOT able to vote for.
The US political system is effectively owned and operated by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Chinas Heavens Mandates system delivers better results for citizens as those in power in China know their necks will be severed if they do not deliver progress for the people.
What I am saying is what I said.
It's there in black and white above.
Your attempts to recharacterise and misrepresent what I have said are simply evidence of your inability to refute what I have said.
The US political system is effectively owned and operated by parasitic corporate sponsors.
It is not a functional democracy - it is a corrupt corporate sponsored cleptocracy of patronage and cronyism.
LOL he's not recharacterizing anything. He's genuinely asking what the Hell you're talking about. Because this:
The US political system is effectively owned and operated by parasitic corporate sponsors.
is a word salad of emotions and vague impressions, that doesn't address the obvious fact that a voter is allowed to write anyone's name on the ballot and anyone is allowed to run on any platform, which is in stark contrast to a non-democratic system like the PRC, where you're not allowed to hold office unless you're a communist and an atheist.
Lol, no, it is a statement of fact you demonstrably cannot refute.
It matters not if voters can write any name they want or if anyone can stand.
USA is effectively a two party system - not a functional democracy.
Both parties are owned by largely the same parasitic corporate sponsors.
The US political system is effectively owned and operated by parasitic corporate sponsors.
Uncle Tom Obama was owned by the military Industrial complex just as much as, if not more, than Trump.
Very typical of a leftist to start hurling slurs when a person of color is slightly Westernized in any way.
In any case, the guy was an obvious Marxist. The arms sales to Taiwan weren't up to him. If the PRC were to launch in an invasion while a Democrat is an office, the US would not intervene.That's why we have to force the issue this term. You had 12 non-consecutive years. You missed your chance.
So you have named 3 politicians which MOST US voters are NOT able to vote for.
Every district has a Democrat on the ballot who spews the same nonsense that you do about evil corporations not paying enough taxes. Everyone is able to vote for all the stuff that you're promoting. In California and New York, they do, and they voted themselves into becoming a slum as a result. On a national level, they weren't supressed or censored or disenfranchized in any way, they just lost.
Chinas Heavens Mandates system delivers better results for citizens as those in power in China know their necks will be severed if they do not deliver progress for the people.
"If we don't like the government we'll revolt" is not a system. Literally every country does this. And obviously the communists don't feel worried by it because they're not delivering progress at all. What they deliver is, like any leftist party, ridiculous micro-managing that makes the country poorer.
What is unique to the PRC's system and leftist regimes is their Qin-esque one-party fanatical legalism where people get executed for opinions.
The Democrats and Republicans are owned by Zionists bankers.
The PRC is not.
Bibi is building his Greater Israel Project as the US empire hurtles toward insolvency.
The Democrats and Republicans are owned by Zionists bankers. The PRC is not.
Zionism is not a legal requirement to run for office. You are allowed to campaign on an anti-Zionist platform. You will not get executed by the state for comparing Israel to Satan. Your complaint seems to be that pro-Israel candidates have more donations and more voters. That's a total non-issue compared to the PRC's problems. The communist party is owned by socialists. And violence is the only way to get rid of them so you shouldn't be offended when they get overthrown using violence because those are the rules they set up.
Effectively Zionists own and control the US government and the Fed Res...
Israeli soldier smokes and pushes another cigarette onto the mouth of a statue of the Virgin Mary in Debel, southern Lebanon, in this picture released on May 6, 2026, and obtained from social media [Social Media via Reuters]
Its not a question of my preferences- it is a matter of the very limited options available to US voters.
Chevron/Big Oil are profiteering from US consumers and Trump will do nothing to stop that because he is owned by Chevron.
Trumps war crimes in the middle east benefit his corporate sponsors, not US voters.