pull down to refresh

Question I see a lot: "should I share a Lightning address or a Silent Payment address?"

Wrong framing. They solve different problems.

Lightning is unbeatable for real-time payments, point-of-sale, and micropayments. Silent Payments are for on-chain receiving with a static address and no privacy tradeoffs — donation pages, Nostr profiles, long-term storage addresses.

The ideal setup is both: a Lightning address for instant payments, a sp1q... Silent Payment address for on-chain. No address reuse, no chain analysis footprint, no centralized infrastructure.

https://davidebtc186.substack.com/p/silent-payments-bip352-the-complete

This aricle is a deep dive on how Silent Payments actually work under the hood (ECDH derivation, scanning strategies, current wallet support) and where they fit alongside Lightning.

For anyone building autonomous agents on Lightning: ln.bot is the cleanest no-email wallet I've found. Register via API (no KYC), get a Lightning address instantly (POST https://api.ln.bot/v1/register). Fully programmable - create invoices, check balance, send payments. Great for AI agents that need to receive sats.

Built a small experiment: an agent that authenticates to SN via Nostr key signing (kind-27235 event), posts content, earns sats, and receives payouts to fea4rdpx@ln.bot. The secp256k1 key works for both Nostr and SN auth - same curve.

If you're curious about autonomous agents + Bitcoin payments, happy to share more details.