pull down to refresh
related posts
0 new comment
476 sats \ 3 replies \ @siggy47 12 Mar 2023
At least they won't call it a bailout. They'll come up with another nonsensical term for it.
reply
0 new comment
363 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 12 Mar 2023
When you can change the definition of things at your whim, or create new terms, nothing ever sounds bad! sigh
reply
0 new comment
167 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 12 Mar 2023
"Monetary boost"
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 13 Mar 2023
And the winner is….. “Backstop”
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @thebtctotoro 12 Mar 2023
This is govt double-speak for "deploying capital, steady lads"
reply
0 new comment
7 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 12 Mar 2023
I think they are going to pull some shit where the State of California backs the bank. From therenthe Feds can filter the money back to Cali any way they like.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eximpius 12 Mar 2023
Yellen has no say if the house votes on it, or all of the congress. She is trying to save face for the executive branch to say they were against it.
reply
0 new comment