pull down to refresh

aaaah BROOO. My take-down of Bunney was pretty savage! Subtle, balanced, and on-point... but saaavage nontheless!

...except that van der Kolk is a man. And no, this isn't a trans argument; he's just straight-up a guy... (fair enough, the topic and the style in which the book is written is very female, but whatever.)
I see this a lot, and I cringe as much when Bitcoiners/self-proclaimed Austrian economists mispronounce "Mises" or "Keynes" or the "Cantillon" effect. I'm not trying to be snobbish or superior (well, ok, maybe that one), looking for that one irrelevant/superficial gotcha or whatever... no, it's because these errors are so unbelievably rudimentary that only someone completely unversed in the topic would make them.
16 sats \ 8 replies \ @ek 26 Jun

I think @itsrealfake's reply was more saaavage (#1017065)

reply

eeeeh... wow, I barely recall this.

Overused word in Bitcoin, but my god, what a retard. Honestly.
I responded with some additional receipts below that comment, I see; go read those before you're out unnecessarily defending retards.

jezus.

reply
119 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 26 Jun

I’d do anything just to piss you off den <3

reply

how silly of me to fall for it -.-

I still have nightmares from Most Comments Wins

reply

I hope @ek has another malevolent social experiment up his sleeve

reply

last one was ingenious. Perfectly attuned, easy to do, memefied.

Should be something around the BIP-110 bet, I suppose

reply
34 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 26 Jun

Oh, and I just remembered we're married!

Is our witness still around? @Aardvark

reply

WHATS?! That's why we fight so much, I presume

reply

hah, me too @ek

reply

Now I'm going to mispronounce them even harder

reply

have fun staying poor... and worse, face Den's wrath.

reply