pull down to refresh

When sorting by "Top Sats" should it be in Descending order of total Sats spent?

Or is there some other logic affecting the order (that I am unaware of)?

111 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 26 Jun

It also takes into account sats spent on comments (although not on a 1-1 basis). If you notice the "So You Wanna work in Bitcoin" post had 40 comments with something like ~2000 sats spent on comments.

The gmaxwell post only had 3 comments.

I suspect the discrepancy comes from the sats spent on comments.

reply
113 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 26 Jun

This is it

reply

I believe it's the net ranking of up - down zaps + sats spent on posting/boosting

reply