pull down to refresh

6 sats \ 5 replies \ @b11ae762a0 OP 13 Jul \ parent \ on: CCs need to be removed from the site meta

i hear you, but i think it undermines the site. i would prefer less users, but sats only.

just make it easier for people to add a wallet. have a guide or something.

if we use fiat (CCs), bitcoin is never going to win.

write
compose
1 sat \ 3 replies \ @denlillaapan 13 Jul

Ah man, are there guides. It was a mess back then, and even the ones that worked kept failing; detaching.

Custodial (up to some max amount, whatever; prison risk is real), easy, simple.

Would have been a different SN trajectory if that'd been the route

reply
54 sats \ 1 reply \ @b11ae762a0 OP 13 Jul

i don't want custodial. it's anti-bitcoin. trusted third-parties are security holes.

reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 13 Jul

this is a (daily attendance) forum with micropayments. We can stomach the tiny risk for the immense convenience. #1506425, #1524157

reply
34 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 13 Jul

Custodial wallet was definitely easier. I agree with that.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @398ja 14 Jul -2 sats
i would prefer less users, but sats only.

Sorry but this is delusional. No one builds a social media platform with such inverted preferences

Respectfully.