pull down to refresh

108 sats \ 1 reply \ @cleophas 17 Jul \ on: BIP110 AMA w/Mechanic bitcoin

If BIP 110 ends up attracting the majority of hashrate, do you think other soft forks will attempt to use the same activation method?

I could see a quantum fork trying to get integrated to Bitcoin this way.

Do you see any risks if most soft forks proceed with much lower signalling rates than past forks?

write
compose
103 sats \ 0 replies \ @Mechanic2 17 Jul

Yes, minority UASFs are clearly possible in Bitcoin and thus an attack vector.

If they are actually malicious (obviously BIP110 is not) then we are obligated to URSF against them and ensure there is no risk to miners pretending a threat of that nature is something they can simply ignore as anti-BIP110 people often present as sufficient.

reply