pull down to refresh

Yes - I can see that you appreciate the magnitude of the problem.

First, development will not be as hard as it might seem:

  • The L1 is a copy of Bitcoin Core -- and will remain so. So we automatically tie Bitcoin for 1st place, in development.
  • We can (and have) added to Bitcoin Core, using CUSF. So we can actually exceed Core, without changing any lines of code in Core.
  • Most of the L2s have already been built. And since they already work, people can fork them to make new L2s.
  • Mostly -- "development" is done by a lone wolf genius. Bitcoin Core is a pointless bureaucracy that just merges new unit tests, and in general they cause far more problems than they solve. That isn't the "development" we need.
  • Most of the "good" altcoins -- fought tooth and nail to be a part of Bitcoin! That was their desire. To develop on Bitcoin. For example -- ETH and Bitcoin Cash -- Vitalik tried to add smart contracts to BTC, and largeblockers fought to get a blocksize increase into Bitcoin. They didn't want to launch an Altcoin! So -- the bottleneck is not "development". The bottleneck is actually "removing the barriers".

Imagine that each cryptocurrency is a ladder. We are climbing the ladder(s) to the top of the mountain. We have climbed very high on the BTC ladder. I am proposing we go all the way back down, and then up the ECX ladder. Why would I suggest this? Because the BTC ladder doesn't actually reach the top. It reaches very high up -- but not to the top. We can either remain in denial about this fact, or we can just Solve The Problem.