pull down to refresh

I didn't realize that was illegal, but this was from the article:

Prosecutors later charged Tunick under a federal statute that makes it unlawful to knowingly destroy or damage property to prevent authorities from seizing it. Tunick has pleaded not guilty.

Some sort of obstruction of justice, I suppose. It seems like the 5th Amendment would apply here. @siggy47, any insights for us?

Either way, depending on what's on the device, you could definitely be better off with this wiping charge.

reply

yea, lesser of two evils in some cases. why these clowns gotta inspect my shit!

reply