pull down to refresh

Look at the top downzapped posts though. There doesn't seem to be a real pattern to it

I've been following it closely. It's frontpage-editing.

Don't look just at the downzaps, look at zaps and boosts too.

Edit: PS: your gql scripts can answer your initial question - just query comments by sats, re-sort by boosts. Then you have a name.

reply
Edit: PS: your gql scripts can answer your initial question - just query comments by sats, re-sort by boosts. Then you have a name.

A name as in who's doing it? I don't think the public API exposes the zaps table (who zapped or downzapped who). But I can definitely get posts/comments and sort them by boost / downzap / zap

reply

Boost is always to self, so that is why you can <3

reply

Ah... hmm hmm! Good point.

Though, if I make a post exposing them, they could change their tactics and use sock puppets to zap their own posts, rather than boosting.

reply

Yeah. I personally wouldn't give much more attention to it than we're already doing, really. People like attention.

reply
126 sats \ 16 replies \ @ek 25 Jul

What about privacy? Shouldn't such a privacy leak be fixed? Are @k00b and @sox aware of this?

reply

What privacy leak? You boost your post it shows in details?

reply

You in #1532229:

your gql scripts can answer your initial question

The initial question was this, afaict:

Who's downzapping everyone?

So I thought you were saying that we can see who is downzapping.

Hmm, interesting. You might be right. What would you say is their agenda?

I could make this the special topic of my next Stacker News Monthly, haha

reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 25 Jul
What would you say is their agenda?

"Because I can".

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 25 Jul -210 sats

So who is it or are you afraid to name them?