pull down to refresh

Thanks for listing mine:) And a little suggestion: you could actually list articles like this, so it might be easier for stackers to look what's there.

Steak 'n Shake: First Time
My Local Bar is Closing: On Schelling Points and the Decline of Third Spaces

The hack I've discovered is simply to go to the page of that article and copy the title, or you can also do it manually with the markdown format: []then()

I getcha, I appreciate ya. I'll say one thing I appreciate is the hover feature (hovering my mouse over the item gives me the title and author and sats, etc.) When that update came along, I stopped listing them this way, because I appreciate the work of the person who created the hover. And listing them out felt redundant after that. I usually add my commentary to the list, this time I just didn't. Yeah, I agree with you, it would have looked better with one of these changes.

reply
1 sat \ 5 replies \ @ek 25 Jul
And a little suggestion: you could actually list articles like this, so it might be easier for stackers to look what's there.

+1

reply

can't believe no other stackers have pointed it out before? eg. @ek

reply
1 sat \ 3 replies \ @ek 25 Jul

I think I did, but I was referring to her bio, not here.

Since she didn't change it there, I assumed she'd considered it but decided against it, so I thought, "Why suggest the same thing again?"

Women are sometimes better left alone. 🙃

reply

I can explain. On my bio, I like the links to first represent quantity. If it were full of text, it would be too much, a wall of text no one would read. Since the hover feature exists, I rely on this to capture the interest of anyone who's curious, which means they'll have to stay longer looking at my page, hovering about. This is a plus.

Women are sometimes better left alone. 🙃

I'm resentful of this statement you made here

reply

Or maybe she didn't like the way you suggested? 👀

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @ek 25 Jul

I don't think so, but 🤷‍♀️

reply