pull down to refresh
I'm not justifying anything? I'm saying that the entire setup of tracking who spends and receives how much is transparent. Was the intent for SN to have zaps to be fully private?
Was the intent for SN to have zaps to be fully private?
Yes, as far as I’ve always considered it (no nyms attached to zaps).
You can opt-out, no?
You can opt out of having your name displayed. You cannot opt out of being ranked.
Fair point, this should also be possible. I forgot about this.
Feel free to blame me for this. Not that I coded or designed it. But that I of all stackers have to tell you this. Shame on me.
FYI, I can probably show you comments where I supported @siggy47 during MSM. He was trying to hide, but the existing privacy settings made that impossible. I did not agree with all the decisions that were made at SN, which may also have been one of the reasons I left. Is that surprising to you?
Is that surprising to you?
Not at all, but you're very quick to ascribe intent to me. Scream shame on "me, of all stackers"? Yeah bro, that's cool and all, but what do you want? Are you chiding me for not doing a responsible disclosure of something that anyone with primary school knowledge of how ranking works can see? If so then maybe I overestimated everyone's intelligence and I actually am sorry if that is the case. But, you don't get to shame me.
I'm sorry for how this conversation went, but when I ask you about a privacy leak and you respond with "what privacy leak?" while seemingly conveniently leaving out relevant details that you later reveal only after I press further, it doesn't look good.
That's what I'm chiding you for.
Sounds like the one who needs privacy the most.
Honestly surprised you, of all stackers on here, are trying to justify a privacy leak, and even pretended there isn't one in #1532595 with "what privacy leak?" afaict.
To be clear, I don't really care about the privacy leak, just about the integrity of stackers.