pull down to refresh
Telling people to create an on-chain footprint of their coin going into a pool borders on maliciousness.
This is the biggest problem I have with the tools-driven narrative. It takes a convenient definition of privacy that is smaller in scope than the consequences attached to action taken, and then assesses everything through the framework covered, dismissing everything outside it.
But what the tool covers is never the whole story. And even if you'd have this tool I'd change something in my surveillance system and I catch you unaware anyway.
The only way is indeed through process. It needs to be continuously evolved. You need to red team it to the max and even then you're only guessing.
That said, tools can, when properly understood and vigilantly reviewed, help the process.
Thank you for your wisdom and clarity sir!
who is down zapping you?
Zapanalysis only assigns probabilities
There are surely earnest people working to make useful things more private, I think CLINK for example is more private in many ways by design than alternatives, but I also don't go around telling people that's why you should use it. It needs to be useful in other ways.
Telling people to create an on-chain footprint of their coin going into a pool borders on maliciousness.
As a great and wise man, @Car, once said: "Incentives rule everything around me."