pull down to refresh

That's not what I was arguing at all though. I'll just ask a question, maybe that will make my last objection clear, because it is worth discussing.

Scenario:

I, normie-opti, migrated in from Eastern Turkey, and I have a great desk job with a US company in Boston. I make about 40x what the entirety of my family back home combined makes, so I wanna send back some cash rather than buy a mansion. I pay my taxes, have my citizenship, all is in order. My salary gets paid through ACH, directly to my Chase account. Sending money directly to their Ziraat Bank account from Chase is difficult due to politics, so I want to use a middleman that makes sure the money gets there.

Please correct me if I am living in the past and a scenario like this is no longer a US reality

Now, my question is:

In which way is Strike as a remission service superior to remitly, for me?

It’s not. Remitly will have to do for you!

Turkey isn’t supported.

But if your country was supported you could ACH your paycheck to strike and then send the family funds to their bank account and it arrives in a few minutes.

reply