pull down to refresh
All the Boltz backends run the same FOSS code and are attacked with the same AI exploits. Once Boltz guys stop sending hot patches, it becomes crazy dangerous to run them.
Yes, Evan is being entirely rational here.
Look at peerswap guys.
Been digging into it a day, given the scope of changes it needs I wouldn't trust it in production right away.
Will have to investigate Electrum Swaps as well, as @super_testnet pointed out.
Path of least resistance for production readiness may simply be LOOP however.
That's one mitigation, such that a zero-day isn't catastrophic. These things are all hot wallets, it makes my skin crawl even at how much people put in Lightning itself.
This may also mean more swap services that are not atomic/trustless, where the maker has time to do extra sanity checks or rate limits.
They use Boltz code afaik, they may want to consider downing until the nature of whatever caused Boltz to shut down is patched.
If this is an extended downtime we may consider wiring in LOOP
we are still having @SwapMarket