What a tragedy. The Coldcard drama has been intense (and somebody is laundering funds via SN??)
If you, for some unfathomable reason, have missed it: immediately go check on your Coldcard. Funds secured by Coldcard products (mk3-5, Q) are in grave danger; move them. This is not a drill. Or a scam.
Background summary: if, as we say in Icelandic when you don’t have a clue what’s going on, “I came all the way from the mountains” (ég kem alveg af fjöllum), should you mess up the most important line of code in your Bitcoin hardware wallet’s firmware, your product is done for and everyone using it has unknowingly put their funds at risk. That was revealed, painfully so, last week.
I had prepared an entire Nordic Node sesh about BIP-110 forks and prediction markets and the purpose of financial markets in society, plus a playbook for trading forkcoins. To no avail: Such is the nature of slow and thoughtful non-AI journalism. Sometimes your neatly laid plans are thrown out by an entropic(!) universe dead set on ruining your afternoon. No bother: I only lost time and (increasingly valueless) words. Others lost life savings. And some lost hope: remember, you are not your stack… and your worth is not determined by it. Go touch some grass (it’s nice this time of year); we shall persevere.
The fork will happen Saturday-ish… and absolutely nobody will care. (If you’re still interested, Jimmy Song’s rundown of “The Messy Middle” was very helpful.) There’s something more important now.
Here’s a mildly uncomfortable thought:Here’s a mildly uncomfortable thought:
For bitcoin to win, truly, you kind of want these attackers to succeed. Money that can’t be stopped and can’t be traced, can’t be in any way clawed back or thwarted. (I refer you to the “Unstoppable” entry in your closest dictionary.)
Not because it’s good that regular sats stackers lost funds (it’s not) or because thieves are great people (they’re not), or because Coldcard users deserve what came to them (definitely not! Could have been any of us…) but because if permissionless freedom money can’t be turned into real goods and services, somewhere and at some point, it isn’t truly global freedom money. It’s just another system of permissioned and surveilled control.
READING LIST:READING LIST:
Coolcations Are Cool: A *Financial Times* feature story (giftlink) about increased holidays to the Nordics. Excellent way to escape heatwaves… we keep it cool and nice up here. Grab a ticket for 25-26 Sept; we cool.
Norway Mania Continues: The other week, we wrote about Norway’s World Cup success. Last week I was bragging even more about Norway, both for the Mises Institute — recounting the extraordinary story of how Norwegian found oil and didn’t mess it up — and (though stupidly headlined) for The Daily Economy, explaining that the typical American’s rose-tinted dream of socialist Nordic paradise is a myth.
Also, Comrade Mamdani: his New York City grocery stores are a bad idea. Brian Albrecht breaks it down in detailed Econ101 fashion for Economic Forces.
Disagree But Worth Reading: Barry Eichengreen, long-term monetary history professor at the credentialed U.C. Berkeley university, has a new book out Money Beyond Borders: Global Currencies From Croesus to Crypto. You’ll be shocked to learn that there’s no bitcoin in there… as in none at all. Stablecoins and gold and empty speculations for a future monetary world beyond the dollar, but nothing about the really obvious candidate for a money beyond borders. Pathetic.
(Yes, I’m reading tradfi economists; up until about six days ago, Bitcoiners were boring…)
The Nordic Node #6: "A Dilution a Week Keeps the Saylorbois Weak"
The Nordic Node #5: "EU Overlords, Decaying Cultures, & Treasury Companies Dying"
The Nordic Node #4: "Satoshi Talks, Mining Controversy, and some Suitcoinery"
The Nordic Node #3: "Two Suitcoiners and a Bitcoin Bodyguard Walk into a Bar..."
The Nordic Node #2: "Lambs, Bitcoin Adoption, and Criminals"
The Nordic Node #1: "Welcome to the Nordic Node!"
Subscribe for The Nordic Node over at BTCHEL.com, the coolest(!) place on the Nordic Bitcoin scene.
all your links have trackers
<cry cry cry>lol. Sorry couldn't help but notice. And couldn't shut up. Poor discipline.Dude, I just copy-pasted from the actual newsletter. Ain't rewriting and fixing every single link for SN!
Just trolling, while also not clicking your spyware.
Yesyes. Should you be interested in any specific link, I shall gladly provide it free of trackers
Thank you kind ser.
I'm real nice like that
here you go, sir @Scoresby
#1539877
this one definitely gave me pause. I agree with you intellectually. but my weak cypherpunk wannabe knees knock as i think of it. it's not an easy path.
exactly. Me too. I hate that conclusion. But I can't quite rebut/reject it
Perhaps we can modify that conclusion to say "We want these attackers to be able to succeed (although we'd also like them to be sloppy enough that they get caught)."
Can we have our cake and eat it too?
sounds good to me.
I don't really agree with this. It feels like reducto ad absurdum, because if you take the logic to the extreme you're kinda saying,
"Society isn't truly free unless wrongdoers can never be caught and punished. Because if they can be caught and punished, then anyone can, and thus no one is truly free." Or somesuch.
I suppose this is why I still don't ever call myself Libertarian with a capital "L", only that I lean libertarian. Society without any kind of effective justice or law enforcement at all, imo wouldn't be able to function; or, put another way, it wouldn't want to be a society I'd want to live in.
Nah disagree with that. I want them to be caught, like any other thief unjustly taking others stuff. I just don't want the monetary system/regulatory state catch them at the gatekept use of their spoils.
Just like I don't want mafio dons flourishing, I don't want Pablo Escobar to be caught because the gas station refuse to take cash and he doxxed himself with a credit card
Fair.
I suppose then that it isn't quite accurate to say "For bitcoin to win, you want the attackers to succeed." But more accurate to say, "For bitcoin to win, you don't want the attackers to be stopped through the internal mechanisms of bitcoin itself."
...yes, ok. Or chain analysis/KYCed exchanges was more what I had in mind
This
wave wave 👋 warts-infested peeps
I've been reflecting a lot on the tension between rights and prudence.
I also don't feel that the ColdCard victims deserved it...but they did take actions that brought this on themselves. I say that as someone who with high probability might have done the same thing.
It's kind of like walking alone through a bad neighborhood at night with expensive shoes and a fancy watch because an influencer told you it was actually a perfectly safe neighborhood. We each have every right to walk where we like without being mugged and we know that there are places you need to take precautions to walk through.
rough and rude but OK fine, I take your point. I'm just talking to a friend now who
(Funds seem safe.)
so yeah, you are responsible for this shit yourself