pull down to refresh
Fair.
I suppose then that it isn't quite accurate to say "For bitcoin to win, you want the attackers to succeed." But more accurate to say, "For bitcoin to win, you don't want the attackers to be stopped through the internal mechanisms of bitcoin itself."
...yes, ok. Or chain analysis/KYCed exchanges was more what I had in mind
Fair.
I suppose then that it isn't quite accurate to say "For bitcoin to win, you want the attackers to succeed." But more accurate to say, "For bitcoin to win, you don't want the attackers to be stopped through the internal mechanisms of bitcoin itself."